Comments on: Obscure, violent left-wing blogger threatens murder for hire! http://www.freespeech.com/?p=540 "On this day, at this hour, it is still within our power to shape the outcome of this battle. Let us find our resolve, and turn events toward victory." - President George W. Bush, 2007 State of the Union Address Sat, 17 Oct 2009 00:08:33 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: FreeSpeech.com » Blog Archives » Poor wittle Chuckie just doesn’t get it, I suppose.. http://www.freespeech.com/?p=540&cpage=1#comment-1299 FreeSpeech.com » Blog Archives » Poor wittle Chuckie just doesn’t get it, I suppose.. Fri, 14 Dec 2007 02:48:56 +0000 http://www.freespeech.com/?p=540#comment-1299 [...] lefty gangsta wanna-be, Chuckles Adkins. The short version is he’s the guy that threatened to have a “hit taken out” on me when he got upset that I questioned his idiotic political positions. To make a long story a bit [...] [...] lefty gangsta wanna-be, Chuckles Adkins. The short version is he’s the guy that threatened to have a “hit taken out” on me when he got upset that I questioned his idiotic political positions. To make a long story a bit [...]

]]> By: The Tao of Chuck Adkins of ThePopulistBlog « docweaselblog http://www.freespeech.com/?p=540&cpage=1#comment-1297 The Tao of Chuck Adkins of ThePopulistBlog « docweaselblog Thu, 13 Dec 2007 04:41:15 +0000 http://www.freespeech.com/?p=540#comment-1297 [...] yet more at Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler FreeSpeech.com You read the blog, now get the [...] [...] yet more at Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler FreeSpeech.com You read the blog, now get the [...]

]]> By: Chuck Adkins » reply to Del Simmons http://www.freespeech.com/?p=540&cpage=1#comment-1179 Chuck Adkins » reply to Del Simmons Mon, 22 Oct 2007 00:26:12 +0000 http://www.freespeech.com/?p=540#comment-1179 [...] Accepted. and Thanks. and you’ll find that you and I agree on lot more that you think, I ain’t no dad-blasted Liberal. I’m right leaning Indy… My dad is a retired GM worker and is a member of the UAW. Hence the Progressive side of me. But that DailyKOS crowd and far left bunch. I cannot stand them, at all.  Their Atheistic, God Denying attitude is enough to make one want to puke. and to be fair, Bill O’Rielly, Malkin and Coulter aren’t my idea of what Conservatism is, really. I grew up in the Reagan era of Conservatism. This Neo-Con horse manure is for the birds. hope you see my point. [...] [...] Accepted. and Thanks. and you’ll find that you and I agree on lot more that you think, I ain’t no dad-blasted Liberal. I’m right leaning Indy… My dad is a retired GM worker and is a member of the UAW. Hence the Progressive side of me. But that DailyKOS crowd and far left bunch. I cannot stand them, at all.  Their Atheistic, God Denying attitude is enough to make one want to puke. and to be fair, Bill O’Rielly, Malkin and Coulter aren’t my idea of what Conservatism is, really. I grew up in the Reagan era of Conservatism. This Neo-Con horse manure is for the birds. hope you see my point. [...]

]]> By: Del Simmons http://www.freespeech.com/?p=540&cpage=1#comment-1178 Del Simmons Sun, 21 Oct 2007 23:45:30 +0000 http://www.freespeech.com/?p=540#comment-1178 Chuck, I'd like you to know that I publicly accept your apology and I appreciate it. I think a few of the caveats you included in your apology seem to lessen the impact, but I will work from the assumption that you meant it and it was heart felt. I was not intending to lay a trap for you, but I did intend to give you a hard time for some of the opinions you expressed on your blog. I would also like to say publicly that I am sorry for communicating in a way that pushed so many of your buttons. While I did intend to get a heated debate started with you, I did not intend for things to spiral out of control as far as they did, and for my part in that situation, I am sorry as well. This whole discussion started with your assertion that those children who were murdered in cold blood by that deranged off-duty police officer somehow only "got what they deserved" because they had verbally insulted him. I think that position is disgusting, Chuck. Nobody's life is worth a verbal insult. Not yours, not mine, and certainly not 6 wet-behind-the-ears teenagers. Your comments on that topic represented a position that is indefensible from a Christian world view. I hope you will reconsider your opinion on that matter. Our conversation went downhill from there. I was bothered by some of the opinions you expressed online and I intended to challenge you on them. There were times when I certainly phrased my remarks to you in a way that was meant to express to you my disgust with your opinion. I was not trying to escalate the situation in the physical realm, but I certainly intended to communicate to you my aggravation with the beliefs you were publishing. I consider your apology accepted and I will now consider this incident closed. I will not be posting on it again. I wish you the best in your life and I am sure we will have many more topics for debate in the future. I hope that you and I will both take to heart what we have learned from this exchange and that we can both learn to approach our political rivals with a more open heart, a more Christ-like demeanor, and a willingness to allow ourselves to disagree agreeably. Sincerely, Del Simmons Chuck,

I’d like you to know that I publicly accept your apology and I appreciate it. I think a few of the caveats you included in your apology seem to lessen the impact, but I will work from the assumption that you meant it and it was heart felt. I was not intending to lay a trap for you, but I did intend to give you a hard time for some of the opinions you expressed on your blog. I would also like to say publicly that I am sorry for communicating in a way that pushed so many of your buttons. While I did intend to get a heated debate started with you, I did not intend for things to spiral out of control as far as they did, and for my part in that situation, I am sorry as well.

This whole discussion started with your assertion that those children who were murdered in cold blood by that deranged off-duty police officer somehow only “got what they deserved” because they had verbally insulted him. I think that position is disgusting, Chuck. Nobody’s life is worth a verbal insult. Not yours, not mine, and certainly not 6 wet-behind-the-ears teenagers. Your comments on that topic represented a position that is indefensible from a Christian world view. I hope you will reconsider your opinion on that matter.

Our conversation went downhill from there. I was bothered by some of the opinions you expressed online and I intended to challenge you on them. There were times when I certainly phrased my remarks to you in a way that was meant to express to you my disgust with your opinion. I was not trying to escalate the situation in the physical realm, but I certainly intended to communicate to you my aggravation with the beliefs you were publishing.

I consider your apology accepted and I will now consider this incident closed. I will not be posting on it again.

I wish you the best in your life and I am sure we will have many more topics for debate in the future. I hope that you and I will both take to heart what we have learned from this exchange and that we can both learn to approach our political rivals with a more open heart, a more Christ-like demeanor, and a willingness to allow ourselves to disagree agreeably.

Sincerely,

Del Simmons

]]> By: Chuck Adkins » Public Apology http://www.freespeech.com/?p=540&cpage=1#comment-1177 Chuck Adkins » Public Apology Sun, 21 Oct 2007 21:58:35 +0000 http://www.freespeech.com/?p=540#comment-1177 [...] would like publicly Apologize to Dell Simmons for Threatening him in private [...] [...] would like publicly Apologize to Dell Simmons for Threatening him in private [...]

]]> By: Redwoodman12 http://www.freespeech.com/?p=540&cpage=1#comment-1176 Redwoodman12 Sun, 21 Oct 2007 07:19:34 +0000 http://www.freespeech.com/?p=540#comment-1176 He's got better things to do than fight with some right winger. Like sit on the internet all day and not look for a job. He’s got better things to do than fight with some right winger. Like sit on the internet all day and not look for a job.

]]> By: snooper http://www.freespeech.com/?p=540&cpage=1#comment-1174 snooper Sun, 21 Oct 2007 06:00:18 +0000 http://www.freespeech.com/?p=540#comment-1174 LOL!! We all have our little whining trolls, don't we? Isn't this the same moron that published Michelle Malkins' "particulars"? What an idgit...35 and still living with mommy. Friggin moron. The little dweeb fits the pathology. http://takeourcountryback-snooper.blogspot.com/2007/09/renewing-iraqnophobia-and-pathology-of.html LOL!! We all have our little whining trolls, don’t we? Isn’t this the same moron that published Michelle Malkins’ “particulars”?

What an idgit…35 and still living with mommy.

Friggin moron.

The little dweeb fits the pathology.

http://takeourcountryback-snooper.blogspot.com/2007/09/renewing-iraqnophobia-and-pathology-of.html

]]> By: Hawk http://www.freespeech.com/?p=540&cpage=1#comment-1173 Hawk Sun, 21 Oct 2007 02:57:44 +0000 http://www.freespeech.com/?p=540#comment-1173 I am absolutely DYING from laughing here. His MOTHER woke him up to get him on the phone? HYSTERICAL! I am absolutely DYING from laughing here. His MOTHER woke him up to get him on the phone?

HYSTERICAL!

]]> By: Mr. Populist [Dan Collins] http://www.freespeech.com/?p=540&cpage=1#comment-1172 Mr. Populist [Dan Collins] Sun, 21 Oct 2007 02:33:12 +0000 http://www.freespeech.com/?p=540#comment-1172 [...] another blogger, threatens to take out a hit. Probably TMI, but . . . Free Speech has the details, in case you’re interested in the peculiar pathology. (h/t [...] [...] another blogger, threatens to take out a hit. Probably TMI, but . . . Free Speech has the details, in case you’re interested in the peculiar pathology. (h/t [...]

]]> By: Darleen http://www.freespeech.com/?p=540&cpage=1#comment-1171 Darleen Sun, 21 Oct 2007 01:31:10 +0000 http://www.freespeech.com/?p=540#comment-1171 I realize there maybe any number of reasons why a 35 y/o would be living with his/her parents but if the first reaction is to blame the President of the United States, then legitimate reasons are all out the window. Poor Chuckie-wuckie confirms all suspicions. I realize there maybe any number of reasons why a 35 y/o would be living with his/her parents

but if the first reaction is to blame the President of the United States, then legitimate reasons are all out the window.

Poor Chuckie-wuckie confirms all suspicions.

]]>